|
|
Quantum phase transitions occur at T=0 as
a function of some non-thermal control parameter.
Consider, e.g., a ferromagnet
|
|
Example: MnSi ( Pfleiderer et al 1997 )
|
|
Near the transition line (t -> 0), one observes critical behavior :
correlation length |
|
|
relaxation time |
|
|
order parameter |
|
|
OP susceptibilty |
|
Critical behavior at the CPT is very well understood
| Question: What is the critical behavior near the QCP ? |
sets an energy scale
|
Crossover at |
|
Quantum vs. classical stat. mech.:
partition fct. |
|
|
classically |
|
statics + dynamics |
QM |
|
statics + dynamics |
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson (LGW) theory:
classically |
|
QM |
|
Hypothesis (based on the above observation) ( Hertz 1976 ):
| QPT in d-dimensions related to CPT in (d+z)-dimensions! |
Landau theory (valid classically for d > dc+ = 4):
Order parameter:
average magnetization (MFA)
|
|
|
|
|
(Ornstein-Zernike plus electron dynamics) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hertz actually derived the Landau theory from a microscopic model.
This theory and its generalizations ( Millis 1993 )
amounts to
integrating out all degrees of freedom other than the OP in tree approximation.
It predicts
continuous transition
mean-field exponents
Tc ~ t3/4 (via a DIV)
Indication that the above conclusion cannot be correct:
In systems with quenched disorder, z = 4
dc+ = 0
= 1/2
for d > 0 according to the above argument.
This violates the Harris criterion (
> 2/d) !
Resolution of problem:
Particle-hole excitations (soft at T=0, any t)
They couple to the OP fluctuations and invalidate LGW theory.
This affects both disordered and clean systems.
( TRK & DB 1996 ; TRK, DB, et al 1997 ff )
MnSi ( Pfleiderer et al.
1997 ,
2001 )
clean (?)
|
|
|
|
|
UGe2 (e.g.,
Saxena et al 2000 ,
Huxley et al 2001 ,
Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002 )
clean
|
|
|
|
ZrZn2 (
Pfleiderer et al 2001 ) and URhGe
(
Aoki et al 2001 )
clean
|
|
|
NixPd1-x
(
Nicklas et al 1999 )
clean (?)
|
|
|
URu2-xRexSi2
( Bauer et al 2002 )
disordered
|
|
|
Summary of Experiments:
Clean systems
Transition at T = 0 may be 1st or 2nd order
1st order
TCP at T > 0
2nd order
mean-field exponents
Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in sufficiently clean
samples
(
different talk )
Disordered systems
Transition 2nd order with non-mean field critical behavior
Non-Fermi liquid behavior in whole regions in the PM phase
Questions:
In clean systems, why is the
transition 1st order in some systems, 2nd order in others ?
|
Critical behavior determined by soft or massless modes
Keep all soft modes explicitly!
2 fields:
OP fluctuations
(soft at t
0, any T)
p-h fluctuations
(soft at T = 0, any t)
Action: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
| ||||||
![]()
free fermions
|
|
|
|
||||
| ||||||
|
|
| |
paramagnon propagator |
|
| |
fermion propagator |
This is Landau/Gaussian theory, cf. Sec. I.2

2nd order
transition with Landau exponents
Two time scales: 1) critical
2) fermionic
3. Generalized Mean-Field Theory ( DB, TRK, TV 1999 )
MFA for OP (
)
+ Gaussian approximation for fermions:
|
|
|
m > 0
coupling between OP and fermions
triplet fermion modes acquire mass ~ m
magnetic Goldstone modes appear instead
Integrate out fermions, |
|
|
|
|
, etc. |
Contribution to equation of state
Generalized mean-field equation of state (d=3):
|
|
|
v>0
first order transition !
Effects of nonzero temperature (T) and disorder (G) :
T>0 gives p-h exitations a mass
|
|
G>0 changes fermion dispersion relation
|
Phase diagram:
|
In agreement with experiments on MnSi, UGe2, URuReSi
Cannot explain experiments on ZrZn2, NiPd
4. Renormalization-Group Analysis
Consider full theory (keep OP fluctuations)
Consider fixed points, then analyze stability
Consider clean case, disordered case proceeds
analogously
Look for fixed point with Gaussian
propagators (Hertz's fixed point)
Such a fixed point exists. Stability
analysis
Stable for d > 1 as long as z = zM
Unstable (c2 relevant) for d < 3 if z = zq
|
This happens if fermion loops are involved, e.g., | |
|
c2 relevant with respect to Landau FP for d < 3 !
Landau FP unstable due to fermion loops
Applies to disordered case as well, only
the numbers change
Need to keep loops systematically
|
e.g., u = |
|
| ||
|
|
|
u has negative
correction
in perturbation theory, u(b ->
) < 0 always
fluctuation-induced first order transition
Maps on classic fluctuation-induced first order transition in superconductors
( Halperin, Lubensky, Ma 1974 )
This is the generalized mean-field theory in RG language
Go beyond perturbation theory:
H(b ->
) ->
Depending on initial conditions,
u(b ->
) < 0 or > 0
Transition may be first or second order !
Physical interpretation :
H ~ specific heat coefficient
Critical behavior of specific heat couples back to u
Energy scales involved: Correlation energy vs Fermi energy or bandwidth
First vs second order depends on ratio of energy scales;
strong correlation favors first order
First order transition
stable if t1 sufficiently large
destroyed by critical fluctuations if t1 is small
|
|
Explicit calculation
Second order case has
mean-field exponents with log corrections in d = 3 (marginal operator c2)
non-mean field exponents in d < 3
Correctly predicts / is consistent with experiments on clean systems !
Explicit calculation for disordered case
Critical behavior as described by generalized mean-field theory with log corrections
Correctly predicts exponents observed in URuReSi !
Low-Tc itinerant ferromagnets are remarkably complex and interesting.
The T = 0 transition can be 1st order for generic reasons: A fluctuation-induced
1st order transition preempts the continuous Landau transition.
Crucial for this mechanism are soft fermionic modes and the resulting two time
scales in the problem.
If the 1st order transition is too close to the second order one it is trying to
preempt, it becomes unstable with respect to a fluctuation-induced 2nd order transition. This transition is in a new
universality class.
Sufficiently strong non-magnetic disorder causes the transition to always be 2nd
order. This constitutes yet another universality class, which is exactly solved.
These results explain, or are consistent with, all experiments to date.
Properties that are not understood (at least not completely):
Ferromagnetic superconducting phase (partially understood)
Non-Fermi liquid behavior (???)